Post by account_disabled on Feb 25, 2024 0:14:15 GMT -6
Zelenskys team is always trying to control the media narrative and does not like anyone deviating from their agenda. These facts together with the lack of adequate explanations for the decision led to the popularization of simplistic explanations for example that Zaluzhny was replaced because he was too pessimistic while Zelensky demanded more optimistic reports from him a good example of this explanation is can be found in this article published in Politico magazin.
This is probably an oversimplification during the summer counteroffensive Jordan Mobile Number List did not see serious disagreements or conflicts within the Ukrainian General Staff or between the military and political leadership. d after the fact the defense of Bakhmut and the simultaneous offensives at several points cannot be assigned to a single person. Although many of the problems of the campaign were due to the lack or untimely delivery of foreign military support the decision to change the commander in chief was likely caused by these same problems. Obviously they are looking for a new strategy to counter Russia in increasingly difficult conditions.
We hope this will focus on exploiting Ukraines strengths as was the case with the naval campaign which was a major victory for Ukraine that reopened the Black Sea to trade. Our impression from outside Ukraine is that criticism of Zelenskys government is increasing and becoming widespread. There have been protests over various issues from the new mobilization law to budget priorities for local government and the plan to rationalize university education. Could you give us an idea of the magnitude of these criticisms and protests Do you think they weaken the war effort This is nothing more than a consequence of the normalization of war and the return of politics.